Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
How to optimize preview.desenvolvimentomit.com.br
2.4 seconds of JavaScript execution time creates 1,310ms Total Blocking Time, severely impacting responsiveness.
Break down large chunks fe84f330 and 9720 using React.lazy() and Suspense for route-based code splitting. Move heavy computations to Web Workers or defer them using setTimeout/requestIdleCallback. Optimize React components by implementing useMemo and useCallback for expensive operations.
A score of 47 falls in the "Poor" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Interaction to Next Paint
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
Cumulative Layout Shift
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
This Next.js site has poor performance with a score of 47/100, indicating significant user experience issues. The biggest problem is excessive unused JavaScript code (224 KiB of waste) combined with heavy JavaScript execution times of 2.4 seconds, which is blocking the page from becoming interactive and causing a slow Largest Contentful Paint of 5.8 seconds. The site is also suffering from render-blocking CSS and multiple LinkedIn tracking requests that create unnecessary network delays. Removing unused JavaScript code, optimizing the main bundle size, and deferring non-critical scripts could potentially improve loading times by 900ms and dramatically enhance the user experience.
Why It Matters:
224 KiB of unused JavaScript is blocking page load and delaying LCP by 900ms.
How to Fix:
Use Next.js dynamic imports to code-split large chunks like 7405-1ba6c8fc89ebb6ad.js (93% unused). Implement tree shaking by reviewing imports and removing unused dependencies. Configure webpack bundle analyzer to identify bloated modules and lazy load non-critical components.
Why It Matters:
LCP element has 5.2 seconds of resource load delay, causing poor user experience.
How to Fix:
Add priority={true} to your Next.js Image component for above-the-fold images. Implement preload hints for the LCP image using next/head. Optimize your image optimization settings in next.config.js and consider using a CDN with better performance than your current setup.
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
More Next.js Speed Tests
2.2 seconds of JavaScript execution time is creating 580ms of Total Blocking Time, hurting user interactivity.
285KB of unused JavaScript is blocking the main thread and delaying LCP by 1.05 seconds.
Unnecessary polyfills add 40KB of code that modern browsers don't need, slowing down execution.
2.9 seconds of JavaScript execution time blocks the main thread and delays Time to Interactive by 11.2 seconds.