Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
How to optimize staging.learn.wowlearnings.org
2.2 seconds of JavaScript execution time is creating 580ms of Total Blocking Time, hurting user interactivity.
Break up long tasks by using React.Suspense and React.lazy for component lazy loading. Move heavy computations to Web Workers or defer them using setTimeout. Configure Next.js with webpack optimizations to reduce bundle parse time and enable modern JavaScript output for supported browsers.
A score of 54 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Interaction to Next Paint
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
Cumulative Layout Shift
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
This Next.js site has poor performance with a score of 54/100, indicating significant user experience issues. The biggest problem is an extremely slow Largest Contentful Paint of 6.3 seconds, caused primarily by render-blocking CSS files that could save 1.1 seconds if optimized. The site is also weighed down by 285KB of unused JavaScript (including Google Analytics code) and excessive main-thread work taking 4 seconds, which prevents users from interacting with the page quickly. Immediate wins include removing unused code, deferring non-critical CSS, and optimizing the JavaScript bundle size to potentially improve the performance score by 30+ points.
Why It Matters:
Render-blocking CSS is delaying LCP by 1.1 seconds, preventing users from seeing meaningful content.
How to Fix:
Move critical CSS inline in your Next.js pages using styled-jsx or CSS-in-JS libraries. Use next/dynamic with ssr: false for non-critical components. Configure Next.js to split CSS chunks more efficiently by optimizing your CSS imports and removing unused styles from the main CSS bundle.
Why It Matters:
285KB of unused JavaScript is blocking the main thread and delaying LCP by 1.05 seconds.
How to Fix:
Implement code splitting using Next.js dynamic imports for heavy components. Remove or defer Google Analytics until after page load using next/script with strategy='lazyOnload'. Use Next.js bundle analyzer to identify and tree-shake unused dependencies from your JavaScript chunks.
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
More Next.js Speed Tests
285KB of unused JavaScript is blocking the main thread and delaying LCP by 1.05 seconds.
Unnecessary polyfills add 40KB of code that modern browsers don't need, slowing down execution.
2.9 seconds of JavaScript execution time blocks the main thread and delays Time to Interactive by 11.2 seconds.
Render-blocking CSS is delaying LCP by 1.1 seconds, preventing users from seeing meaningful content.