Optimize Image Responsive Sizing

How to optimize tamer.web.vercel.app

Next.js SiteScore: 73/100Analyzed January 2026

Optimize Image Responsive Sizing

Medium Impact+5 points estimated

Why It Matters

Images are served at larger dimensions than displayed, wasting 39 KiB of bandwidth and slowing perceived load time.

How to Fix

Update Next.js Image components with proper `sizes` prop based on actual display dimensions. Use responsive breakpoints in `sizes` like '(max-width: 768px) 300px, 579px'. Ensure `width` and `height` props match the largest display size to prevent oversized downloads.

0Needs Improvement

What This Score Means

A score of 73 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.

This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.

Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.

Core Web Vitals Analysis

LCP

Largest Contentful Paint

4.9s
Poor

Good: < 2.5s

Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen

INP

Interaction to Next Paint

192ms
Good

Good: < 200ms

Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions

CLS

Cumulative Layout Shift

0.00
Good

Good: < 0.1

Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load

AI Performance Analysis

This Next.js site has moderate performance issues with a score of 73/100. The biggest problem is render-blocking CSS files that are delaying your Largest Contentful Paint to 4.9 seconds, with an estimated 740ms improvement possible by deferring or inlining these stylesheets. The site is also carrying 238KB of unused JavaScript code that's contributing to a very slow Time to Interactive of 9.5 seconds, making the page feel unresponsive to users. Addressing the render-blocking resources and removing unused JavaScript could improve your score by 15-20 points and dramatically enhance the user experience, particularly on mobile devices.

Other Optimization Recommendations

Eliminate Render Blocking CSS

High Impact+12 points estimated

Why It Matters:

CSS files are blocking initial render and delaying LCP by 750ms, which is the largest single performance bottleneck.

How to Fix:

Use Next.js built-in CSS optimization by moving critical styles to CSS-in-JS or inline them. Split large CSS bundles using dynamic imports for non-critical styles. Consider using `next/dynamic` with `ssr: false` for components that load heavy CSS.

Reduce Unused JavaScript Bundle

High Impact+10 points estimated

Why It Matters:

238 KiB of unused JavaScript is delaying LCP by 450ms and blocking main thread execution.

How to Fix:

Implement code splitting using Next.js dynamic imports for non-critical components. Analyze bundle with `@next/bundle-analyzer` to identify unused dependencies. Use tree shaking by ensuring imports are specific (import { component } from 'library' instead of import * from 'library').

Want to Analyze YOUR Website?

Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds

More Next.js Speed Tests

Next.js Performance Resources

Frequently Asked Questions

Keep Your Site Fast After Optimization

Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.

Explore DeployHQ →Trusted by engineering teams shipping high-performance sites