LCP
Largest Contentful Paint
13.9s
Poor
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Fix Layout Shift Issues
How to optimize learn.wowlearnings.org
Fix Layout Shift Issues
Medium Impact+15 points estimated
Why It Matters
Large layout shifts (CLS: 0.352) create jarring user experience as content jumps during page load.
How to Fix
Add explicit width and height props to all Next.js Image components. Reserve space for dynamic content using CSS aspect-ratio or min-height. Preload custom fonts using next/font to prevent font swap layout shifts.
0Poor
What This Score Means
A score of 9 falls in the "Poor" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Core Web Vitals Analysis
INP
Interaction to Next Paint
1017ms
Poor
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
CLS
Cumulative Layout Shift
0.35
Poor
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
AI Performance Analysis
This Next.js site has severe performance issues with a score of only 9/100, indicating critical problems that need immediate attention. The biggest issue is render-blocking CSS that's delaying page loading by 750ms, combined with massive amounts of unused JavaScript (471 KiB) and CSS (28 KiB) that are unnecessarily slowing down the site. The Largest Contentful Paint takes an extremely slow 13.9 seconds, and users may experience over 1 second of input delay due to JavaScript execution blocking the main thread for 41+ seconds. Removing unused code, optimizing the CSS delivery, and addressing the layout shifts (CLS of 0.352) should be the immediate priorities to dramatically improve both performance scores and user experience.
Other Optimization Recommendations
Eliminate Render Blocking CSS
High Impact+25 points estimatedWhy It Matters:
Render blocking CSS delays LCP by 750ms and prevents critical content from appearing quickly.
How to Fix:
Use Next.js's built-in CSS optimization by moving critical styles inline or using CSS-in-JS. Split the large CSS bundle (31KB) into component-specific chunks using CSS modules. Defer non-critical CSS using Next.js dynamic imports with ssr: false for below-fold components.
Remove Unused JavaScript Code
High Impact+20 points estimatedWhy It Matters:
471KB of unused JavaScript increases bundle size and blocks the main thread for 2.6 seconds.
How to Fix:
Use Next.js Bundle Analyzer to identify large unused chunks. Implement dynamic imports for non-critical components and libraries. Configure webpack tree shaking in next.config.js and remove legacy polyfills since modern browsers support these features natively.
Keep Your Site Fast After Optimization
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Explore DeployHQ →Trusted by engineering teams shipping high-performance sites
Want to Analyze YOUR Website?
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
Related Performance Analyses
More Next.js Speed Tests
Next.js Performance Resources
Optimize JavaScript Execution Time
2.2 seconds of JavaScript execution time is creating 580ms of Total Blocking Time, hurting user interactivity.
Reduce Unused JavaScript Payload
285KB of unused JavaScript is blocking the main thread and delaying LCP by 1.05 seconds.
Remove Legacy JavaScript Polyfills
Unnecessary polyfills add 40KB of code that modern browsers don't need, slowing down execution.
Optimize JavaScript Bundle Splitting
2.9 seconds of JavaScript execution time blocks the main thread and delays Time to Interactive by 11.2 seconds.