LCP
Largest Contentful Paint
3.3s
Needs Improvement
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Optimize Image Dimensions for Display
How to optimize gaming.tracker.pages.dev
Optimize Image Dimensions for Display
High Impact+8 points estimated
Why It Matters
Oversized images delay LCP by 150ms and waste 31KB of data transfer.
How to Fix
Resize cover images to match their display dimensions (315x472px instead of 400x600px). Update your image processing pipeline to generate properly sized images for each breakpoint. Use responsive images with correctly sized srcset variants to prevent downloading unnecessarily large files.
0Needs Improvement
What This Score Means
A score of 85 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Core Web Vitals Analysis
INP
Interaction to Next Paint
167ms
Good
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
CLS
Cumulative Layout Shift
0.00
Good
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
AI Performance Analysis
This gaming tracker website has good performance with a score of 85/100, but there are several opportunities for improvement. The biggest issue is render-blocking CSS that's delaying the initial page load, combined with oversized images that are wasting 31KB of bandwidth and slowing down the Largest Contentful Paint by 150ms. The site is also loading 20KB of unused JavaScript code that could be removed or deferred to improve loading times. Optimizing image sizes for their actual display dimensions and deferring non-critical CSS could easily push this site into the 90+ performance range.
Other Optimization Recommendations
Eliminate Forced Layout Reflows
High Impact+7 points estimatedWhy It Matters:
JavaScript is triggering 76ms of forced reflows that block the main thread and degrade user experience.
How to Fix:
Batch DOM reads and writes to avoid layout thrashing in your SvelteKit components. Cache geometric properties like offsetWidth instead of repeatedly querying them. Move layout calculations to requestAnimationFrame callbacks or use CSS transforms for animations instead of changing layout properties.
Remove Unused JavaScript Code
Medium Impact+5 points estimatedWhy It Matters:
20KB of unused JavaScript increases parse time and delays interactivity without providing value.
How to Fix:
Use SvelteKit's code splitting to load only necessary chunks per route. Audit the aCH5_5x6.js bundle to identify and remove unused functions (45% is currently unused). Implement dynamic imports for features that aren't immediately needed on page load.
Keep Your Site Fast After Optimization
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Explore DeployHQ →Trusted by engineering teams shipping high-performance sites
Want to Analyze YOUR Website?
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
Related Performance Analyses
More Generic Speed Tests
Generic Performance Resources
Optimize Image Sizing
Images are 32KB larger than needed, slowing LCP by 150ms due to oversized assets.
Fix LCP Image Discovery
LCP image isn't discoverable in initial HTML, causing a 4.8s delay that severely impacts user experience.
Optimize LCP Image Discovery
LCP image takes 11.7 seconds to load due to poor resource discovery and lacks priority hints.
Remove Unused CSS Stylesheets
208 KiB of unused CSS delays rendering and LCP by 1.2 seconds.