Optimize Image Sizing

How to optimize gaming.tracker.pages.dev

Generic SiteScore: 76/100Analyzed May 2026Re-analyze this site

Optimize Image Sizing

Medium Impact+8 points estimated

Why It Matters

Images are 32KB larger than needed, slowing LCP by 150ms due to oversized assets.

How to Fix

Generate properly sized images that match display dimensions (311x467px instead of 400x600px). Update your responsive image pipeline to create images at exact breakpoint sizes. Ensure srcset includes the optimal size for each viewport. Use modern formats like AVIF alongside WebP for better compression.

0Needs Improvement

What This Score Means

A score of 76 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.

This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.

Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.

Core Web Vitals Analysis

LCP

Largest Contentful Paint

4.8s
Poor

Good: < 2.5s

Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen

INP

Interaction to Next Paint

306ms
Needs Improvement

Good: < 200ms

Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions

CLS

Cumulative Layout Shift

0.00
Good

Good: < 0.1

Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load

AI Performance Analysis

This gaming tracker website has good but not great performance with a score of 76/100. The biggest problem is slow image loading, with the Largest Contentful Paint taking 4.8 seconds due to oversized game cover images that are larger than needed for their display size. The site is also suffering from JavaScript code that forces the browser to recalculate layouts unnecessarily, creating delays in user interactions. Optimizing the game cover images to match their actual display dimensions and fixing the layout calculation issues in the JavaScript could improve loading speed by several seconds and significantly enhance the user experience.

Other Optimization Recommendations

Fix LCP Image Discovery

High Impact+18 points estimated

Why It Matters:

LCP image isn't discoverable in initial HTML, causing a 4.8s delay that severely impacts user experience.

How to Fix:

Add a preload link tag in your HTML head for the LCP image: `<link rel='preload' as='image' href='/covers/13-sentinels-aegis-rim-detail.webp' fetchpriority='high'>`. Ensure the LCP image URL is directly in the initial HTML rather than loaded via JavaScript. Consider server-side rendering if using client-side image loading.

Eliminate Forced Reflows

High Impact+12 points estimated

Why It Matters:

JavaScript is causing 42ms of forced reflows by reading layout properties after DOM changes, blocking the main thread.

How to Fix:

Review code in 5FB2I90v.js and 0.CEtX7XGx.js files to batch DOM reads before writes. Use requestAnimationFrame for layout operations. Cache geometric property values instead of repeatedly querying offsetWidth/offsetHeight. Consider using CSS transforms instead of changing layout properties.

Keep Your Site Fast After Optimization

Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.

Explore DeployHQ →Trusted by engineering teams shipping high-performance sites

Want to Analyze YOUR Website?

Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds

More Generic Speed Tests

Generic Performance Resources

Frequently Asked Questions