LCP
Largest Contentful Paint
6.5s
Poor
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Optimize LCP Element Discovery
How to optimize ormimaq.com.br
WordPress SiteScore: 59/100Analyzed February 2026
Optimize LCP Element Discovery
High Impact+15 points estimated
Why It Matters
LCP element has 7.5 second resource load delay because it's not discoverable from initial HTML.
How to Fix
Add fetchpriority='high' to the hero section background image or container. Move critical CSS inline for above-the-fold content. Ensure LCP element styling is not dependent on external stylesheets that delay rendering.
0Needs Improvement
What This Score Means
A score of 59 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Core Web Vitals Analysis
INP
Interaction to Next Paint
98ms
Good
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
CLS
Cumulative Layout Shift
0.00
Good
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
AI Performance Analysis
This WordPress site has poor performance with a score of 59/100, primarily due to excessive unused CSS that's blocking initial page rendering and delaying content visibility. The biggest issue is the main stylesheet (style.css) which contains 99 KiB of unused CSS rules, causing a 4.4-second delay in First Contentful Paint and contributing to a sluggish 6.5-second Largest Contentful Paint. Additionally, the site is loading 29 KiB of unused JavaScript from the Swiper library and has inefficient font loading that adds nearly 900ms of delay. Cleaning up the CSS by removing unused rules, optimizing JavaScript loading, and implementing proper font-display strategies could dramatically improve performance and boost the score by 30+ points.
Other Optimization Recommendations
Remove Unused CSS and JavaScript
High Impact+18 points estimatedWhy It Matters:
Unused assets waste 130KB of bandwidth and delay FCP by 1.05 seconds, severely impacting Core Web Vitals.
How to Fix:
Use WP Rocket or Asset CleanUp to remove unused Woodmart theme CSS (101KB savings). Audit the swiper.min.js library showing 96% unused code. Consider code splitting or conditional loading for unused JavaScript components.
Fix Font Display Strategy
Medium Impact+8 points estimatedWhy It Matters:
Custom fonts block text rendering for 880ms, delaying FCP and creating poor user experience.
How to Fix:
Add font-display: swap to @font-face declarations in your theme CSS. Preload critical Woodmart fonts using <link rel='preload'>. Use font fallbacks with size-adjust property to minimize layout shift during font swaps.
Want to Analyze YOUR Website?
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
Related Performance Analyses
More WordPress Speed Tests
WordPress Performance Resources
Fix Font Display Strategy
Custom fonts block text rendering for 880ms, delaying FCP and creating poor user experience.
Remove Unused CSS and JavaScript
Unused assets waste 130KB of bandwidth and delay FCP by 1.05 seconds, severely impacting Core Web Vitals.
Eliminate Render Blocking CSS Files
CSS files are blocking page rendering and delaying FCP by 8.99 seconds, severely impacting user experience.
Reduce JavaScript Execution Time
194KB of unused JavaScript creates 850ms of blocking time and extends Time to Interactive to 9.6 seconds.
Frequently Asked Questions
Keep Your Site Fast After Optimization
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Explore DeployHQ →Trusted by engineering teams shipping high-performance sites