Implement Efficient Browser Caching

How to optimize stijnvansprang.nl

WordPress SiteScore: 70/100Analyzed February 2026Re-analyze this site

Implement Efficient Browser Caching

High Impact+25 points estimated

Why It Matters

Missing cache headers force 174 KiB of resources to re-download on every visit, delaying LCP by 800ms and FCP by 650ms.

How to Fix

Add cache headers via your WordPress hosting panel or .htaccess file for static assets. Set 1-year expiry for jQuery, fonts, and JavaScript files. Configure your CDN or hosting provider to automatically cache WordPress assets with proper headers.

0Needs Improvement

What This Score Means

A score of 70 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.

This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.

Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.

Core Web Vitals Analysis

LCP

Largest Contentful Paint

5.2s
Poor

Good: < 2.5s

Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen

INP

Interaction to Next Paint

17ms
Good

Good: < 200ms

Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions

CLS

Cumulative Layout Shift

0.03
Good

Good: < 0.1

Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load

AI Performance Analysis

This WordPress site has poor performance with a score of 70/100, showing concerning load times of 4.4 seconds for both First Contentful Paint and a 5.2-second Largest Contentful Paint. The biggest issue is inefficient caching, which could save 174 KiB and improve loading times by up to 800ms - critical files like jQuery and tracking scripts have no cache lifetime set. Additional quick wins include removing 20 KiB of unused FontAwesome CSS (99% unused), deferring render-blocking stylesheets that are delaying initial paint by 820ms, and optimizing font loading with proper font-display settings. Addressing these caching and CSS optimization issues could easily boost the performance score into the 80s and significantly improve user experience.

Other Optimization Recommendations

Eliminate Render-Blocking CSS Resources

High Impact+20 points estimated

Why It Matters:

Multiple CSS files are blocking initial page render, delaying both LCP and FCP by 800ms.

How to Fix:

Use a WordPress optimization plugin like WP Rocket or Autoptimize to defer non-critical CSS. Inline critical above-the-fold styles directly in the HTML head. Load WooCommerce and plugin CSS files asynchronously using loadCSS or similar technique.

Remove Unused FontAwesome CSS

Medium Impact+8 points estimated

Why It Matters:

99.4% of the 20KB FontAwesome CSS file is unused, contributing unnecessary bloat to your page load.

How to Fix:

Replace FontAwesome with individual SVG icons for only the icons you use. Alternatively, use a FontAwesome subset generator to include only required icons. Consider switching to WordPress's built-in Dashicons for basic UI elements.

Keep Your Site Fast After Optimization

Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.

Explore DeployHQ →Trusted by engineering teams shipping high-performance sites

Want to Analyze YOUR Website?

Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds

More WordPress Speed Tests

WordPress Performance Resources

Frequently Asked Questions