LCP
Largest Contentful Paint
9.3s
Poor
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Configure Browser Caching Headers
How to optimize thedoctorsbjorkman.com
Configure Browser Caching Headers
Medium Impact+12 points estimated
Why It Matters
Poor cache lifetimes waste 80KB on repeat visits and slow FCP by 450ms for returning users.
How to Fix
Enable Webflow's advanced hosting features for automatic cache headers. For external resources like GSAP and Iubenda, add preconnect hints in Custom Code head section: <link rel='preconnect' href='https://cdn.prod.website-files.com'>. Contact hosting provider to extend cache duration for static assets.
0Needs Improvement
What This Score Means
A score of 64 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Core Web Vitals Analysis
INP
Interaction to Next Paint
87ms
Good
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
CLS
Cumulative Layout Shift
0.00
Good
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
AI Performance Analysis
This Webflow site has poor performance issues with a score of 64/100. The biggest problem is extremely slow interactivity, taking 9.5 seconds for the page to become fully interactive, along with a 9.3-second Largest Contentful Paint that severely impacts user experience. The main culprits are render-blocking scripts (especially the Iubenda privacy widget), oversized images that are much larger than their display dimensions, and inefficient caching of critical JavaScript files like GSAP libraries. Fixing these issues by deferring non-critical scripts, properly sizing images, and implementing better caching could potentially improve the performance score by 30+ points and dramatically reduce loading times.
Other Optimization Recommendations
Optimize Render-Blocking Resources
High Impact+25 points estimatedWhy It Matters:
Render-blocking CSS and JavaScript delay First Contentful Paint by 900ms and severely impact LCP (9.3s).
How to Fix:
In Webflow's Custom Code settings, defer the Iubenda script by adding 'defer' attribute or move it to footer. Inline critical CSS styles in the head section. Use Webflow's built-in asset optimization to minimize CSS files.
Implement Proper Image Optimization
High Impact+18 points estimatedWhy It Matters:
Oversized gallery images waste 664KB and delay LCP by 250ms while missing dimensions cause layout shifts.
How to Fix:
In Webflow Designer, add explicit width/height to all gallery marquee images. Use Webflow's responsive image settings to serve appropriately sized images. Enable Webflow's automatic WebP conversion in Project Settings > Hosting.
Keep Your Site Fast After Optimization
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Explore DeployHQ →Trusted by engineering teams shipping high-performance sites
Want to Analyze YOUR Website?
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
Related Performance Analyses
More Webflow Speed Tests
Webflow Performance Resources
Implement Proper Image Optimization
Oversized gallery images waste 664KB and delay LCP by 250ms while missing dimensions cause layout shifts.
Optimize Render-Blocking Resources
Render-blocking CSS and JavaScript delay First Contentful Paint by 900ms and severely impact LCP (9.3s).
Add Image Dimensions and Optimize Delivery
Missing image dimensions cause layout shifts and poor CLS, while oversized images waste 22KB and delay LCP by 150ms.
Fix Render-Blocking Resources
Critical resources are blocking initial render for 3.7 seconds, directly delaying both FCP (4.6s) and LCP (10.4s).