Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
How to optimize learn.wowlearnings.org
Over 286KB of unused JavaScript and 29KB of unused CSS are being loaded, directly impacting LCP by 150ms.
Use Next.js bundle analyzer to identify unused code in your chunks. Implement dynamic imports for components not needed on initial load. Configure webpack in next.config.js to enable tree shaking and remove unused CSS with PurgeCSS or similar tools.
A score of 85 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Interaction to Next Paint
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
Cumulative Layout Shift
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
This Next.js/React site has good performance with a score of 85/100, but there's significant room for improvement in loading speed. The biggest issue is excessive JavaScript that's slowing down the page - there's 286 KB of unused JavaScript code being downloaded unnecessarily, and the site takes 7.6 seconds to become fully interactive. The main culprits are Google Analytics tracking code and several Next.js chunks that are mostly unused, plus render-blocking CSS files that delay initial page display. Removing unused JavaScript, optimizing CSS delivery, and potentially code-splitting could save nearly 600ms in loading time and dramatically improve the user experience.
Why It Matters:
CSS files are blocking initial page render and delaying LCP by 590ms with significant impact on Core Web Vitals.
How to Fix:
Move critical CSS inline in your Next.js pages using styled-jsx or CSS-in-JS. Configure next.config.js to extract above-the-fold CSS. Use dynamic imports for non-critical CSS files and implement CSS code splitting with Next.js built-in optimization.
Why It Matters:
Large JavaScript bundles are causing 1.6s execution time and 200ms blocking time, severely impacting interactivity.
How to Fix:
Implement Next.js code splitting with dynamic imports for route-based chunks. Move Google Analytics to load asynchronously after page interactive. Configure webpack chunks to split vendor libraries from application code and defer non-critical scripts.
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
More Next.js Speed Tests
Render-blocking CSS files delay FCP by 750ms and contribute to the poor initial paint performance.
756 KiB of unused JavaScript delays LCP by 3.9 seconds and wastes 3.9 seconds of load time.
The redirect from commissions.gg to www.commissions.gg wastes 780ms and delays both FCP and LCP by 800ms each.
LCP element has 3.2 second render delay causing the poor 7-second LCP score.