Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
How to optimize learn.wowlearnings.org
284 KiB of unused JavaScript is delaying LCP by 1.05 seconds and blocking page interactivity.
Implement Next.js dynamic imports for components not needed above-the-fold. Use next/bundle-analyzer to identify large unused chunks. Configure tree-shaking in your webpack config and remove Google Analytics from initial bundle by loading it asynchronously after page load.
A score of 61 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Interaction to Next Paint
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
Cumulative Layout Shift
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
This Next.js site has poor performance with a score of 61/100, indicating significant user experience issues. The biggest problem is excessive JavaScript that's blocking page rendering and taking too long to load - your Largest Contentful Paint is a very slow 6.8 seconds, well above the recommended 2.5 seconds. The site is loading 284 KiB of unused JavaScript code (including Google Analytics and other scripts) and using outdated JavaScript that could be 40 KiB smaller with modern browser features. Removing unused code, optimizing your JavaScript bundle, and fixing render-blocking CSS files could potentially improve your load times by over 1 second and dramatically boost your performance score.
Why It Matters:
32KB of blocking CSS delays both FCP and LCP by 300ms while preventing initial page render.
How to Fix:
Extract critical CSS using Next.js built-in CSS optimization or tools like critical. Inline above-the-fold styles directly in your pages/_document.js. Load non-critical CSS asynchronously using next/dynamic with ssr: false for components below the fold.
Why It Matters:
72ms of forced reflows are blocking the main thread and degrading user interaction responsiveness.
How to Fix:
Batch DOM reads and writes in your React components using useLayoutEffect instead of useEffect for layout-related updates. Cache element dimensions instead of repeatedly querying offsetWidth. Replace synchronous style calculations with CSS-in-JS solutions or CSS custom properties.
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
More Next.js Speed Tests
Render-blocking CSS files delay FCP by 750ms and contribute to the poor initial paint performance.
756 KiB of unused JavaScript delays LCP by 3.9 seconds and wastes 3.9 seconds of load time.
The redirect from commissions.gg to www.commissions.gg wastes 780ms and delays both FCP and LCP by 800ms each.
LCP element has 3.2 second render delay causing the poor 7-second LCP score.