Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
How to optimize learn.wowlearnings.org
JavaScript execution takes 2.1 seconds and creates 420ms of Total Blocking Time, severely impacting interactivity.
Use Next.js dynamic imports to code-split large chunks like 0cnk-vj-0hm9p.js. Remove unused JavaScript polyfills for modern browsers (40KB savings available). Defer Google Tag Manager loading until after page interaction using next/script with strategy='lazyOnload'.
A score of 84 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Interaction to Next Paint
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
Cumulative Layout Shift
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
This Next.js/React site has good but not optimal performance with a score of 84/100. The biggest problem is excessive JavaScript execution taking 2.1 seconds, which is blocking user interactions and causing an 8.7-second delay before the page becomes fully interactive. The site is loading 284 KB of unused JavaScript code and has render-blocking CSS files that delay initial page rendering by 530ms. Reducing JavaScript bundle sizes, removing unused code, and deferring non-critical CSS could improve the score significantly and make the site much more responsive for users.
Why It Matters:
CSS files are blocking initial page render and delaying both LCP and FCP by 530ms.
How to Fix:
Inline critical CSS directly in the Next.js page component using styled-jsx or CSS-in-JS. Use next/dynamic with ssr: false for non-critical styles. Split the large 31KB CSS file into smaller, page-specific chunks using CSS modules.
Why It Matters:
Over 284KB of unused JavaScript and 29KB of unused CSS are being downloaded unnecessarily.
How to Fix:
Enable Next.js tree-shaking by using ES6 imports and avoiding default exports where possible. Remove unused CSS by auditing the 93% unused styles in the main CSS file. Use next-unused to identify and remove dead code from your React components.
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
More Next.js Speed Tests
Render-blocking CSS files delay FCP by 750ms and contribute to the poor initial paint performance.
756 KiB of unused JavaScript delays LCP by 3.9 seconds and wastes 3.9 seconds of load time.
The redirect from commissions.gg to www.commissions.gg wastes 780ms and delays both FCP and LCP by 800ms each.
LCP element has 3.2 second render delay causing the poor 7-second LCP score.