Optimize Main Thread JavaScript Execution

How to optimize learn.wowlearnings.org

Next.js SiteScore: 88/100Analyzed June 2026Re-analyze this site

Optimize Main Thread JavaScript Execution

Medium Impact+8 points estimated

Why It Matters

2.0 seconds of JavaScript execution time blocks user interactions and increases Total Blocking Time by 150ms.

How to Fix

Break up the large 3.3MB JavaScript chunk using Next.js code splitting at the page level. Implement React.lazy() and Suspense for heavy components to defer non-critical rendering. Use web workers for CPU-intensive tasks and consider moving to React 18's concurrent features to prevent main thread blocking.

0Needs Improvement

What This Score Means

A score of 88 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.

This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.

Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.

Core Web Vitals Analysis

LCP

Largest Contentful Paint

2.9s
Needs Improvement

Good: < 2.5s

Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen

INP

Interaction to Next Paint

168ms
Good

Good: < 200ms

Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions

CLS

Cumulative Layout Shift

0.01
Good

Good: < 0.1

Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load

AI Performance Analysis

This Next.js site has good performance with a score of 88/100, but there's significant room for improvement in JavaScript optimization. The biggest issue is excessive JavaScript execution time (2.0 seconds) and unused code, with 284 KiB of unnecessary JavaScript being loaded and 23 KiB of unused CSS slowing down the page. The site takes 7 seconds to become fully interactive and has a Speed Index of 6.2 seconds, primarily due to render-blocking CSS files that could save 620ms if properly deferred. Optimizing your JavaScript bundles, removing unused code, and addressing the render-blocking resources could easily push this site into the 90+ performance range and dramatically improve user experience.

Other Optimization Recommendations

Eliminate CSS Render Blocking Resources

High Impact+12 points estimated

Why It Matters:

Render-blocking CSS delays LCP by 600ms and FCP by 600ms, significantly impacting perceived load speed.

How to Fix:

Use Next.js built-in CSS optimization by moving critical styles inline with styled-jsx or CSS-in-JS. Split the large 26KB CSS file using dynamic imports for route-specific styles. Implement critical CSS extraction using @critters/webpack-plugin in next.config.js to inline above-the-fold styles.

Reduce Unused JavaScript Bundle Size

High Impact+10 points estimated

Why It Matters:

284KB of unused JavaScript wastes bandwidth and delays LCP by 150ms while blocking the main thread.

How to Fix:

Enable Next.js tree shaking by using ES6 imports and avoiding default exports for large libraries. Implement dynamic imports with Next.js lazy loading for non-critical components using next/dynamic. Use webpack-bundle-analyzer to identify and remove unused dependencies, particularly the oversized Google Analytics and chunk files.

Keep Your Site Fast After Optimization

Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.

Explore DeployHQ →Trusted by engineering teams shipping high-performance sites

Want to Analyze YOUR Website?

Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds

More Next.js Speed Tests

Next.js Performance Resources

Frequently Asked Questions