Optimize LCP Image Loading

How to optimize web.dev.floristerias.co

Next.js SiteScore: 48/100Analyzed February 2026Re-analyze this site

Optimize LCP Image Loading

High Impact+15 points estimated

Why It Matters

Your LCP image has a 1.7-second resource load delay and 979ms render delay, contributing to a poor 6.2-second LCP score.

How to Fix

Add priority={true} to your LCP image component in Next.js to enable fetchpriority='high'. Preload the LCP image using next/head with <link rel='preload' as='image'>. Optimize your CDN cache settings to reduce the 1.7s load delay. Consider using next/image with fill={false} and explicit dimensions for better performance.

0Poor

What This Score Means

A score of 48 falls in the "Poor" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.

This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.

Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.

Core Web Vitals Analysis

LCP

Largest Contentful Paint

6.2s
Poor

Good: < 2.5s

Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen

INP

Interaction to Next Paint

802ms
Poor

Good: < 200ms

Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions

CLS

Cumulative Layout Shift

0.00
Good

Good: < 0.1

Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load

AI Performance Analysis

This Next.js site has poor performance with a score of 48/100, indicating significant issues that need immediate attention. The biggest problem is excessive JavaScript execution time (2.3 seconds) and main-thread blocking (3.1 seconds), which causes your page to become interactive extremely slowly at 14.4 seconds and delays content visibility to 6.2 seconds. Your site is loading 462 KB of unused JavaScript, particularly from Google Tag Manager and analytics scripts, and using outdated JavaScript polyfills that add unnecessary 13 KB of code for modern browsers. Quick wins include removing unused JavaScript code, updating your build process to target modern browsers, implementing better caching strategies for your product images, and optimizing the logo image format from PNG to WebP, which could collectively improve your score by 30+ points and dramatically enhance user experience.

Other Optimization Recommendations

Reduce JavaScript Execution Time

High Impact+25 points estimated

Why It Matters:

JavaScript execution takes 2.3 seconds and blocks the main thread for 1.3 seconds, severely impacting Total Blocking Time and user interactivity.

How to Fix:

Split your Next.js bundles using dynamic imports for non-critical components. Remove unused Google Tag Manager code (104KB wasted). Implement code splitting with Next.js dynamic() for heavy components that aren't immediately visible. Consider lazy loading analytics scripts after user interaction.

Modernize JavaScript Build Target

Medium Impact+8 points estimated

Why It Matters:

Your bundle includes 13KB of unnecessary polyfills for modern browser features, adding extra parsing and execution overhead.

How to Fix:

Update your Next.js target in next.config.js to 'es2020' or 'esnext' to remove polyfills for Array.prototype.at, Object.hasOwn, and other modern features. Configure your browserslist to exclude legacy browsers if not needed. This will reduce bundle size and improve parsing performance.

Keep Your Site Fast After Optimization

Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.

Explore DeployHQ →Trusted by engineering teams shipping high-performance sites

Want to Analyze YOUR Website?

Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds

More Next.js Speed Tests

Next.js Performance Resources

Frequently Asked Questions