Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
How to optimize learn.wowlearnings.org
1.8 seconds of JavaScript execution time is blocking the main thread and increasing Total Blocking Time by 400ms.
Break up large JavaScript tasks using React.Suspense and lazy loading for heavy components. Move non-critical JavaScript execution to Web Workers where possible. Use React.useMemo and useCallback to prevent unnecessary re-renders that cause forced reflows.
A score of 65 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Interaction to Next Paint
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
Cumulative Layout Shift
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
This Next.js site has poor performance with a score of 65/100, indicating significant user experience issues. The biggest problem is excessive JavaScript execution taking 1.8 seconds, combined with 285 KiB of unused JavaScript code that's unnecessarily slowing down page loads and causing your Largest Contentful Paint to reach 5.8 seconds. The site is also suffering from render-blocking CSS files that could save 580ms if properly optimized, plus nearly 30 KiB of unused CSS that should be removed. Focusing on reducing JavaScript bundle sizes, removing unused code, and optimizing CSS delivery could improve your score by 20-30 points and dramatically speed up the site for users.
Why It Matters:
CSS files are blocking page render for 580ms, directly delaying LCP by 600ms and FCP by 600ms.
How to Fix:
Use Next.js built-in CSS optimization by moving critical CSS inline or using CSS-in-JS solutions like styled-components. Split the large 31KB CSS file into component-specific modules. Implement critical CSS extraction using tools like critical or Critters in your Next.js build process.
Why It Matters:
285KB of unused JavaScript is wasting bandwidth and delaying LCP by 750ms.
How to Fix:
Use Next.js dynamic imports to code-split large components and defer loading until needed. Remove unused Google Tag Manager features or load them asynchronously. Implement tree-shaking by ensuring your build process eliminates dead code from the 74% unused chunks.
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
More Next.js Speed Tests
Render-blocking CSS files delay FCP by 750ms and contribute to the poor initial paint performance.
756 KiB of unused JavaScript delays LCP by 3.9 seconds and wastes 3.9 seconds of load time.
The redirect from commissions.gg to www.commissions.gg wastes 780ms and delays both FCP and LCP by 800ms each.
LCP element has 3.2 second render delay causing the poor 7-second LCP score.