Optimize JavaScript Bundle Splitting

How to optimize learn.wowlearnings.org

Next.js SiteScore: 67/100Analyzed May 2026Re-analyze this site

Optimize JavaScript Bundle Splitting

High Impact+18 points estimated

Why It Matters

Excessive JavaScript execution time of 2.0 seconds is blocking the main thread and delaying LCP by 900ms.

How to Fix

Use Next.js dynamic imports to code-split large chunks like 0ajqs2jt65kqb.js (950ms execution time). Implement React.lazy() for components not needed on initial render. Configure webpack bundle analyzer to identify and remove unused dependencies from your bundles.

0Needs Improvement

What This Score Means

A score of 67 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.

This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.

Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.

Core Web Vitals Analysis

LCP

Largest Contentful Paint

5.6s
Poor

Good: < 2.5s

Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen

INP

Interaction to Next Paint

186ms
Good

Good: < 200ms

Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions

CLS

Cumulative Layout Shift

0.01
Good

Good: < 0.1

Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load

AI Performance Analysis

This Next.js/React site has concerning performance issues with a score of 67/100, indicating significant room for improvement. The biggest problem is excessive JavaScript execution taking 3.5 seconds of main thread work, which is causing your page to become interactive very slowly at 8.8 seconds and delaying your Largest Contentful Paint to 5.6 seconds. The site is loading 284 KB of unused JavaScript code and has render-blocking CSS files that could save 560ms if optimized. Reducing JavaScript bundle sizes, removing unused code, and deferring non-critical resources would dramatically improve your Core Web Vitals and user experience.

Other Optimization Recommendations

Eliminate Render-Blocking CSS Resources

High Impact+15 points estimated

Why It Matters:

CSS files are blocking First Contentful Paint and LCP by 550ms, preventing users from seeing content quickly.

How to Fix:

Use Next.js built-in CSS optimization by moving critical styles inline with styled-jsx or CSS-in-JS. Defer non-critical CSS using next/dynamic with ssr: false for below-the-fold components. Split CSS chunks to load only necessary styles per route.

Remove Legacy JavaScript Polyfills

Medium Impact+8 points estimated

Why It Matters:

Unnecessary polyfills are adding 40KB of unused code and delaying LCP by 250ms for modern browsers.

How to Fix:

Update your Next.js browserslist config to target modern browsers (>0.25%, not dead). Configure Babel to exclude polyfills for baseline JavaScript features like Array.prototype.at and Object.hasOwn. Use differential loading to serve modern JS to capable browsers.

Keep Your Site Fast After Optimization

Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.

Explore DeployHQ →Trusted by engineering teams shipping high-performance sites

Want to Analyze YOUR Website?

Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds

More Next.js Speed Tests

Next.js Performance Resources

Frequently Asked Questions