LCP
Largest Contentful Paint
6.2s
Poor
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Optimize Image Responsive Sizing
How to optimize learn.wowlearnings.org
Optimize Image Responsive Sizing
Medium Impact+8 points estimated
Why It Matters
Images are 36KB larger than needed for their display dimensions, wasting bandwidth and slowing LCP.
How to Fix
Update your Next.js Image component sizes prop to match actual display dimensions (284x160 instead of 640x360). Use responsive breakpoints in your srcSet configuration. Enable Next.js automatic image optimization with proper quality settings for course thumbnails.
0Poor
What This Score Means
A score of 48 falls in the "Poor" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Core Web Vitals Analysis
INP
Interaction to Next Paint
342ms
Needs Improvement
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
CLS
Cumulative Layout Shift
0.00
Good
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
AI Performance Analysis
This Next.js/React website has poor performance with a score of 48/100, indicating significant user experience issues. The biggest problem is excessive JavaScript that's blocking the page from becoming interactive, taking a painful 9.3 seconds and wasting 296 KB of unused code that could be eliminated or deferred. The site is also suffering from render-blocking CSS files that delay initial page display by 640ms and inefficient caching that wastes 44 KB on repeat visits. Addressing the JavaScript bloat and implementing proper code splitting would likely improve the performance score by 15-20 points and dramatically reduce the frustrating wait times users currently experience.
Other Optimization Recommendations
Eliminate Render-Blocking CSS
High Impact+15 points estimatedWhy It Matters:
Critical CSS files are blocking page rendering by 650ms, directly delaying both FCP and LCP.
How to Fix:
Inline critical CSS for above-the-fold content directly in your Next.js pages. Use next/dynamic with ssr: false for non-critical components. Configure your CSS bundle splitting to defer non-critical styles using Next.js's built-in CSS optimization.
Remove Unused JavaScript Code
High Impact+12 points estimatedWhy It Matters:
296KB of unused JavaScript is delaying LCP by 900ms and blocking the main thread.
How to Fix:
Enable Next.js tree-shaking by using ES6 imports and avoiding default imports for large libraries. Remove Google Tag Manager or defer it using next/script with strategy='afterInteractive'. Use Next.js bundle analyzer to identify and eliminate unused chunks.
Keep Your Site Fast After Optimization
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Explore DeployHQ →Trusted by engineering teams shipping high-performance sites
Want to Analyze YOUR Website?
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
Related Performance Analyses
More Next.js Speed Tests
Next.js Performance Resources
Optimize Critical CSS Rendering
Render-blocking CSS files delay FCP by 750ms and contribute to the poor initial paint performance.
Reduce Unused JavaScript Bundle Size
756 KiB of unused JavaScript delays LCP by 3.9 seconds and wastes 3.9 seconds of load time.
Eliminate Redirect and Optimize Server Response
The redirect from commissions.gg to www.commissions.gg wastes 780ms and delays both FCP and LCP by 800ms each.
Eliminate Element Render Delay
LCP element has 3.2 second render delay causing the poor 7-second LCP score.