Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
How to optimize learn.wowlearnings.org
Images are oversized by 36KB and poorly cached, creating unnecessary bandwidth usage and slower loads.
Configure Next.js Image component with proper responsive breakpoints using sizes prop to serve 284x160 instead of 640x360 images. Set up longer cache headers for images in next.config.js headers configuration. Consider using Next.js 13+ with the new optimized Image component and AVIF format support.
A score of 82 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Interaction to Next Paint
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
Cumulative Layout Shift
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
This Next.js site has good performance with a score of 82/100, but there's significant room for improvement. The biggest problem is excessive JavaScript execution taking 2.1 seconds, which is blocking user interactions and making the page feel sluggish with an 8.8-second Time to Interactive. The site is loading nearly 300KB of unused JavaScript code and has render-blocking CSS files that delay initial page rendering by about 600ms. Reducing JavaScript bundle sizes, removing unused code, and optimizing CSS delivery could improve performance by 15+ points and dramatically enhance user responsiveness.
Why It Matters:
CSS files are blocking initial render and delaying LCP by 600ms, which is the most critical Core Web Vital issue.
How to Fix:
In your Next.js app, move critical CSS inline using next/head for above-the-fold styles. Configure next.config.js to enable CSS optimization with experimental.optimizeCss. Split the large 31KB CSS bundle by implementing CSS modules or styled-components for component-specific styling.
Why It Matters:
JavaScript execution takes 2.1 seconds and blocks the main thread, severely impacting Total Blocking Time (420ms).
How to Fix:
Implement Next.js dynamic imports for non-critical components using next/dynamic with ssr: false. Remove 285KB of unused JavaScript by code-splitting with React.lazy() and tree-shaking unused Google Analytics code. Enable Next.js SWC minification in production build.
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
More Next.js Speed Tests
Render-blocking CSS files delay FCP by 750ms and contribute to the poor initial paint performance.
756 KiB of unused JavaScript delays LCP by 3.9 seconds and wastes 3.9 seconds of load time.
The redirect from commissions.gg to www.commissions.gg wastes 780ms and delays both FCP and LCP by 800ms each.
LCP element has 3.2 second render delay causing the poor 7-second LCP score.