Optimize Image Delivery and Sizing

How to optimize metavgc.com

Next.js SiteScore: 71/100Analyzed May 2026Re-analyze this site

Optimize Image Delivery and Sizing

Medium Impact+12 points estimated

Why It Matters

Images are oversized and poorly compressed, wasting 289 KiB of bandwidth with no impact on visual quality.

How to Fix

Use Next.js Image component with proper sizing - images are served at 475x475 but displayed at 168x168. Implement responsive images with srcSet for different screen sizes. Increase compression settings for WebP images to reduce file sizes by 30-50% without quality loss.

0Needs Improvement

What This Score Means

A score of 71 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.

This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.

Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.

Core Web Vitals Analysis

LCP

Largest Contentful Paint

2.6s
Needs Improvement

Good: < 2.5s

Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen

INP

Interaction to Next Paint

453ms
Needs Improvement

Good: < 200ms

Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions

CLS

Cumulative Layout Shift

0.06
Good

Good: < 0.1

Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load

AI Performance Analysis

This Next.js/React site has fair performance with a score of 71/100, but faces significant JavaScript execution issues. The biggest problem is excessive JavaScript processing taking 3.7 seconds, which creates a poor user experience with 1.3 seconds of blocking time that prevents users from interacting with the page. The site is loading 367 KiB of unused JavaScript from ad networks and analytics, plus 43 KiB of unnecessary legacy code that modern browsers don't need. Optimizing JavaScript delivery, removing unused code, and implementing better caching (currently missing for key images) could improve the score by 15-20 points and dramatically reduce the 14-second time to interactive.

Other Optimization Recommendations

Reduce JavaScript Execution Time

High Impact+25 points estimated

Why It Matters:

JavaScript execution takes 3.7 seconds and blocks the main thread, causing 1,330ms Total Blocking Time which severely impacts user interactions.

How to Fix:

Split large chunks using Next.js dynamic imports with React.lazy() for non-critical components. Remove or defer third-party scripts like Criteo and ad networks until after page load. Use Next.js Script component with strategy='lazyOnload' for analytics and tracking scripts.

Eliminate Render-Blocking CSS

High Impact+18 points estimated

Why It Matters:

The main CSS file blocks initial render and delays both FCP and LCP by 150ms each.

How to Fix:

Extract critical above-the-fold CSS and inline it in the HTML head. Use Next.js built-in CSS optimization by splitting the large CSS chunk into smaller, page-specific bundles. Remove unused CSS rules (75% of current CSS is unused) using PurgeCSS or similar tools.

Keep Your Site Fast After Optimization

Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.

Explore DeployHQ →Trusted by engineering teams shipping high-performance sites

Want to Analyze YOUR Website?

Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds

More Next.js Speed Tests

Next.js Performance Resources

Frequently Asked Questions