Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
How to optimize khoji.connect.happythoughts.in
Images are oversized for their display dimensions, wasting 545 KiB and slowing page load.
Replace <img> tags with Next.js Image component for automatic optimization. Use responsive image sizing with sizes prop based on viewport breakpoints. Convert PNG logo to WebP format and generate multiple sizes. Set up proper image CDN caching with longer cache lifetimes (1 year minimum).
A score of 52 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Interaction to Next Paint
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
Cumulative Layout Shift
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
This Next.js site has poor performance with a score of 52/100, indicating significant user experience issues. The biggest problem is an extremely slow Largest Contentful Paint of 19.1 seconds, primarily caused by 570 KiB of unused JavaScript code that's unnecessarily blocking page rendering. The site is also loading oversized images (545 KiB wasted) and executing too much JavaScript (1.3 seconds), which prevents users from interacting with the page for over 21 seconds. Removing unused JavaScript code, optimizing image sizes, and implementing code splitting could dramatically improve load times and boost the performance score by 30+ points.
Why It Matters:
570 KiB of unused JavaScript is blocking rendering and delaying LCP by 3 seconds.
How to Fix:
Use Next.js dynamic imports to code-split components that aren't needed immediately. Analyze webpack-bundle-analyzer to identify unused dependencies. Enable tree-shaking by ensuring all imports use ES6 modules syntax. Consider lazy loading non-critical components with React.lazy().
Why It Matters:
1.3 seconds of JavaScript execution time is blocking the main thread and preventing user interactions.
How to Fix:
Split large JavaScript chunks using Next.js automatic code splitting with dynamic imports. Move heavy computations to Web Workers or defer them until after page load. Optimize the largest script (87192c9e968bf768.js) by breaking it into smaller, route-specific chunks using Next.js pages-based splitting.
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
More Next.js Speed Tests
1.3 seconds of JavaScript execution time is blocking the main thread and preventing user interactions.
Your bundle includes 13KB of unnecessary polyfills for modern browser features, adding extra parsing and execution overhead.
Your LCP image has a 1.7-second resource load delay and 979ms render delay, contributing to a poor 6.2-second LCP score.
JavaScript execution takes 2.3 seconds and blocks the main thread for 1.3 seconds, severely impacting Total Blocking Time and user interactivity.