Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
How to optimize credittime.kz
Images lack proper dimensions causing layout shifts and are over-compressed, wasting 135KB of bandwidth.
Add explicit width and height props to all Next.js Image components to prevent CLS. Use Next.js Image optimization with quality=75 for better compression. Implement proper responsive images with srcSet for different screen sizes.
A score of 93 falls in the "Good" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Interaction to Next Paint
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
Cumulative Layout Shift
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
This Next.js site performs well overall with a score of 93/100, but has one critical issue: it takes 9.2 seconds to become fully interactive, which is extremely slow for user engagement. The main culprits are render-blocking CSS that delays initial page display by 160ms and excessive unused JavaScript from tracking scripts (Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Ringostat) that waste 310KB of downloads. Additionally, the site uses outdated JavaScript polyfills that aren't needed for modern browsers, adding unnecessary 36KB. Optimizing these tracking scripts, deferring non-critical JavaScript, and modernizing the code could dramatically improve interactivity while maintaining the excellent loading performance.
Why It Matters:
CSS is blocking initial render and delaying First Contentful Paint by 150ms.
How to Fix:
Use Next.js font optimization with next/font to inline critical CSS. Extract above-the-fold styles and inline them in the document head. Defer non-critical CSS using media='print' onload trick or dynamic imports.
Why It Matters:
240ms of main thread blocking time prevents user interactions and delays Time to Interactive.
How to Fix:
Remove 310KB of unused JavaScript from analytics scripts. Use Next.js dynamic imports for heavy components that aren't immediately needed. Configure webpack to split vendor chunks and enable code splitting for analytics libraries.
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
More Next.js Speed Tests
Legacy polyfills waste 11KB and slow LCP by 150ms for modern browsers.
The main CSS file blocks initial render, delaying both LCP and FCP by 100ms.
91% of CSS is unused, blocking render and delaying LCP by 300ms.
The LCP element has a massive 2.5-second render delay, indicating JavaScript is blocking rendering of critical content.