Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
How to optimize dev.happythoughts.in
Critical CSS is blocking initial render and delaying both FCP and LCP by 150ms.
Extract above-the-fold CSS and inline it in the HTML head. Use Next.js CSS-in-JS solutions like styled-jsx or emotion for critical styles. Move non-critical CSS to load asynchronously using Next.js dynamic imports or the 'media' attribute trick.
A score of 69 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Interaction to Next Paint
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
Cumulative Layout Shift
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
This Next.js/React site has poor performance with a score of 69/100, indicating significant user experience issues. The biggest problem is an extremely slow Largest Contentful Paint of 6.0 seconds, primarily caused by a 3.8-second element render delay from an inefficient SVG image in the header. The site is also loading 73 KB of unused JavaScript code and using legacy JavaScript features that add unnecessary bloat, which could be eliminated by updating the build configuration to target modern browsers. Fixing the problematic header image, removing unused code, and addressing render-blocking CSS could potentially improve the performance score by 30+ points and drastically reduce page load times.
Why It Matters:
Element render delay of 3.8 seconds is blocking LCP and causing the 6-second load time.
How to Fix:
The LCP element appears to be an SVG image with base64-encoded data. Convert this to an optimized static image file and use Next.js Image component. Remove the base64 encoding from the SVG mask and serve the image from a CDN. Consider using a smaller logo variant for faster initial render.
Why It Matters:
73KB of unused JavaScript is delaying LCP by 450ms and increasing bundle size unnecessarily.
How to Fix:
Use Next.js bundle analyzer to identify unused code in chunks 9da6db1e and 9204. Implement dynamic imports for components that aren't immediately needed. Configure Next.js to target modern browsers only in next.config.js to remove legacy polyfills for Array.at, Object.hasOwn, etc.
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
More Next.js Speed Tests
18 KiB of legacy JavaScript polyfills are unnecessary for modern browsers and slow down parsing.
The LCP image takes 3.9 seconds to load due to missing priority optimization.
Element render delay of 3.8 seconds is blocking LCP and causing the 6-second load time.
3.2 seconds of main thread work creates 690ms Total Blocking Time, preventing user interactions.