LCP
Largest Contentful Paint
2.6s
Needs Improvement
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Eliminate Render-Blocking CSS
How to optimize credittime.kz
Eliminate Render-Blocking CSS
High Impact+15 points estimated
Why It Matters
CSS is blocking initial render and delaying First Contentful Paint by 150ms.
How to Fix
Use Next.js font optimization with next/font to inline critical CSS. Extract above-the-fold styles and inline them in the document head. Defer non-critical CSS using media='print' onload trick or dynamic imports.
0Good
What This Score Means
A score of 93 falls in the "Good" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Core Web Vitals Analysis
INP
Interaction to Next Paint
241ms
Needs Improvement
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
CLS
Cumulative Layout Shift
0.00
Good
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
AI Performance Analysis
This Next.js site performs well overall with a score of 93/100, but has one critical issue: it takes 9.2 seconds to become fully interactive, which is extremely slow for user engagement. The main culprits are render-blocking CSS that delays initial page display by 160ms and excessive unused JavaScript from tracking scripts (Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Ringostat) that waste 310KB of downloads. Additionally, the site uses outdated JavaScript polyfills that aren't needed for modern browsers, adding unnecessary 36KB. Optimizing these tracking scripts, deferring non-critical JavaScript, and modernizing the code could dramatically improve interactivity while maintaining the excellent loading performance.
Other Optimization Recommendations
Reduce JavaScript Main Thread Blocking
High Impact+12 points estimatedWhy It Matters:
240ms of main thread blocking time prevents user interactions and delays Time to Interactive.
How to Fix:
Remove 310KB of unused JavaScript from analytics scripts. Use Next.js dynamic imports for heavy components that aren't immediately needed. Configure webpack to split vendor chunks and enable code splitting for analytics libraries.
Optimize Image Delivery and Sizing
Medium Impact+8 points estimatedWhy It Matters:
Images lack proper dimensions causing layout shifts and are over-compressed, wasting 135KB of bandwidth.
How to Fix:
Add explicit width and height props to all Next.js Image components to prevent CLS. Use Next.js Image optimization with quality=75 for better compression. Implement proper responsive images with srcSet for different screen sizes.
Keep Your Site Fast After Optimization
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Explore DeployHQ →Trusted by engineering teams shipping high-performance sites
Want to Analyze YOUR Website?
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
Related Performance Analyses
More Next.js Speed Tests
Next.js Performance Resources
Optimize Critical CSS Rendering
Render-blocking CSS files delay FCP by 750ms and contribute to the poor initial paint performance.
Reduce Unused JavaScript Bundle Size
756 KiB of unused JavaScript delays LCP by 3.9 seconds and wastes 3.9 seconds of load time.
Eliminate Redirect and Optimize Server Response
The redirect from commissions.gg to www.commissions.gg wastes 780ms and delays both FCP and LCP by 800ms each.
Eliminate Element Render Delay
LCP element has 3.2 second render delay causing the poor 7-second LCP score.