Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
How to optimize mentimeter.com
The redirect from mentimeter.com to www.mentimeter.com adds 780ms delay and directly impacts both LCP and FCP by 800ms.
Update your primary domain configuration to serve content directly from www.mentimeter.com without redirects. Configure your DNS and server settings to make www.mentimeter.com the canonical URL. Update all internal links and marketing materials to use the www version directly.
A score of 84 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Interaction to Next Paint
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
Cumulative Layout Shift
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
This Next.js site has good performance with a score of 84/100, but there's room for improvement. The biggest issue is multiple page redirects that are adding nearly 800ms of unnecessary delay to your First Contentful Paint and Largest Contentful Paint, which currently sit at 2.3s and 3.5s respectively. The site is also loading 435KB of unused JavaScript and has render-blocking CSS files that could be optimized or inlined to save an additional 940ms. Fixing the redirect chain and reducing unused code could easily push this site into the 90+ performance range and deliver a much faster user experience.
Why It Matters:
CSS files are blocking initial render for 940ms, delaying both LCP and FCP by 950ms each.
How to Fix:
Implement CSS code splitting in your Next.js app by moving critical above-the-fold styles inline in the document head. Use Next.js dynamic imports to load non-critical CSS asynchronously. Consider inlining the smaller CSS files (577B and 1.8KB) directly into your HTML to eliminate additional network requests.
Why It Matters:
435KB of unused JavaScript is being loaded, including 52% unused code in GTM and Next.js chunks, slowing down parsing and execution.
How to Fix:
Implement code splitting in your Next.js app using dynamic imports for components not needed on initial page load. Audit your Google Tag Manager configuration to remove unused tags and triggers. Use Next.js bundle analyzer to identify and remove unused dependencies from your main bundle.
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
More Next.js Speed Tests
Poor caching configuration forces users to re-download resources on repeat visits, missing opportunities for faster load times.
356KB of unused JavaScript is bloating your bundle size and slowing down page load without providing value.
CSS files are blocking initial page render and delaying FCP by 1 second, directly impacting user experience.
Render-blocking CSS delays First Contentful Paint by 900ms, preventing users from seeing content quickly.