Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
How to optimize klee.me
Style & Layout operations consume 900ms of main thread time, potentially blocking user interactions.
Simplify CSS selectors and reduce nesting depth. Minimize use of expensive CSS properties like box-shadow and gradients. Consider using CSS containment to isolate layout work to specific page sections.
A score of 100 falls in the "Good" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Interaction to Next Paint
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
Cumulative Layout Shift
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
This website achieves a perfect performance score of 100/100, indicating excellent loading speeds and user experience. However, there are still some optimization opportunities, with the main issue being excessive main-thread work that takes 2.5 seconds to complete, primarily caused by style and layout calculations rather than JavaScript execution. The site also experiences forced reflows where JavaScript queries element dimensions after DOM changes, causing the browser to recalculate layouts unnecessarily. While these issues don't currently impact the Core Web Vitals scores, addressing the forced reflows in the main JavaScript file and optimizing style/layout operations could make the site even more responsive and future-proof against performance degradation.
Why It Matters:
JavaScript is triggering forced reflows that block the main thread and degrade INP performance.
How to Fix:
Batch DOM reads and writes to avoid forced synchronous layout calculations. Use requestAnimationFrame() for DOM manipulations. Cache geometric properties instead of repeatedly querying them in your main-MUUQU6Q4.js file.
Why It Matters:
225ms of rendering time suggests complex paint operations that could impact visual stability.
How to Fix:
Use CSS transforms instead of changing layout properties for animations. Promote frequently animated elements to their own compositor layers with will-change or transform3d(). Optimize complex visual effects that trigger expensive repaints.
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
More Generic Speed Tests
Google Tag Manager scripts contain 139KB of unused code, slowing LCP by 600ms and wasting processing time.
17MB of video content has zero cache lifetime, forcing full re-downloads on every visit and wasting 69MB of bandwidth.
JavaScript files are blocking initial page render, delaying FCP by 750ms and preventing users from seeing content.
136KB of unused JavaScript and 63KB of unused CSS waste bandwidth and slow down page parsing.
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.