Optimize Images and Implement Responsive Sizing

How to optimize ibg.amco44.com

Generic SiteScore: 67/100Analyzed May 2026Re-analyze this site

Optimize Images and Implement Responsive Sizing

High Impact+25 points estimated

Why It Matters

Images are oversized by 405 KiB and delay LCP by 900ms due to inefficient delivery.

How to Fix

Resize images to match display dimensions - the American Airlines logo is 4096x1518 but displays at 227x84. Convert PNG images to WebP format for 30-50% size reduction. Add responsive image attributes with srcset for different screen sizes. Set explicit width and height attributes to prevent layout shifts.

0Needs Improvement

What This Score Means

A score of 67 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.

This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.

Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.

Core Web Vitals Analysis

LCP

Largest Contentful Paint

11.5s
Poor

Good: < 2.5s

Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen

INP

Interaction to Next Paint

28ms
Good

Good: < 200ms

Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions

CLS

Cumulative Layout Shift

0.01
Good

Good: < 0.1

Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load

AI Performance Analysis

This website has poor performance with a score of 67/100, primarily due to severe loading speed issues. The biggest problem is an extremely slow Largest Contentful Paint of 11.5 seconds, caused by oversized images that are 4x larger than needed and poor caching strategies that waste 484 KB on repeat visits. The site is also blocked by render-blocking CSS files that delay the initial page display by nearly 2 seconds, while unused code in Font Awesome (98% unused) and JavaScript libraries adds unnecessary bloat. Quick wins include properly sizing images, enabling efficient caching, and removing unused CSS/JavaScript, which together could improve the performance score by 25+ points and dramatically enhance user experience.

Other Optimization Recommendations

Eliminate Render-Blocking CSS Resources

High Impact+20 points estimated

Why It Matters:

CSS files are blocking initial render and delaying FCP by 1,920ms.

How to Fix:

Inline critical CSS directly in the HTML head for above-the-fold content. Defer non-critical CSS like Font Awesome (98% unused) using media='print' onload technique. Remove unused Font Awesome icons or use a custom build with only required icons. Load remaining CSS asynchronously after initial render.

Optimize Font Loading Strategy

Medium Impact+12 points estimated

Why It Matters:

Font downloads are extending the critical path to 1071ms and causing text rendering delays.

How to Fix:

Add font-display: swap to all font declarations to show fallback text immediately. Preload the most critical font files (Cairo regular weight) using <link rel='preload'>. Self-host Google Fonts instead of loading from external CDN. Reduce the Material Symbols font size (1.1MB) by using only required icons.

Keep Your Site Fast After Optimization

Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.

Explore DeployHQ →Trusted by engineering teams shipping high-performance sites

Want to Analyze YOUR Website?

Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds

More Generic Speed Tests

Generic Performance Resources

Frequently Asked Questions