LCP
Largest Contentful Paint
23.2s
Poor
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Optimize Image Delivery and Sizing
How to optimize videoelephant.com
Generic SiteScore: 48/100Analyzed January 2026
Optimize Image Delivery and Sizing
High Impact+15 points estimated
Why It Matters
Images are oversized for display dimensions, wasting 364 KiB and delaying LCP by 300ms.
How to Fix
Implement responsive images using srcset attributes to serve appropriately sized images. Compress existing images further - the hero video poster can be reduced by 101KB. Add explicit width and height attributes to prevent layout shifts.
0Poor
What This Score Means
A score of 48 falls in the "Poor" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Core Web Vitals Analysis
INP
Interaction to Next Paint
180ms
Good
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
CLS
Cumulative Layout Shift
0.00
Good
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
AI Performance Analysis
This website has severe performance issues with a critically low score of 48/100. The biggest problem is extremely poor image optimization, which is wasting 364 KiB and delaying page load by 300ms - images are being served at much larger dimensions than needed and could benefit from better compression. The site also suffers from render-blocking resources that are delaying initial page rendering by over 3 seconds, and massive video files (over 12MB total) that lack proper caching. Fixing image sizes, implementing responsive images, and adding proper caching headers could dramatically improve the user experience and boost the performance score by 30+ points.
Other Optimization Recommendations
Remove Render Blocking Resources
High Impact+18 points estimatedWhy It Matters:
Critical CSS and JavaScript files are blocking page render, delaying FCP by 3.35 seconds.
How to Fix:
Inline critical CSS from tailwind.css into the HTML head. Defer non-critical JavaScript like scripts.min.js using async or defer attributes. Load TypeKit fonts asynchronously with font-display: swap to prevent render blocking.
Eliminate Unused JavaScript and CSS
Medium Impact+12 points estimatedWhy It Matters:
412 KiB of unused JavaScript and 26 KiB of unused CSS are increasing load times unnecessarily.
How to Fix:
Remove unused Google Tag Manager code and HubSpot forms JavaScript from initial bundle. Tree-shake Tailwind CSS to only include used classes. Defer loading of analytics scripts until after page interaction or use a tag manager with conditional loading.
Want to Analyze YOUR Website?
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
Related Performance Analyses
More Generic Speed Tests
Generic Performance Resources
Remove Unused JavaScript Code
Google Tag Manager scripts contain 139KB of unused code, slowing LCP by 600ms and wasting processing time.
Optimize Video File Caching
17MB of video content has zero cache lifetime, forcing full re-downloads on every visit and wasting 69MB of bandwidth.
Defer Render-Blocking JavaScript
JavaScript files are blocking initial page render, delaying FCP by 750ms and preventing users from seeing content.
Remove Unused CSS and JavaScript
136KB of unused JavaScript and 63KB of unused CSS waste bandwidth and slow down page parsing.
Frequently Asked Questions
Keep Your Site Fast After Optimization
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Explore DeployHQ →Trusted by engineering teams shipping high-performance sites