Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
How to optimize gaming.tracker.pages.dev
Oversized images are wasting 31KB and delaying LCP by 150ms with unnecessary data transfer.
Generate properly sized responsive images at 180x270px for the actual display size. Update srcset to include this exact dimension. Use picture element with media queries for different breakpoints. Remove fetchpriority='high' from below-the-fold images to prioritize above-the-fold content loading.
A score of 82 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Interaction to Next Paint
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
Cumulative Layout Shift
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
This gaming tracker website has good performance with a score of 82/100, but there are several opportunities for improvement. The biggest issue is forced reflows caused by JavaScript that's unnecessarily querying element dimensions, which is creating a poor Max Potential First Input Delay of 370ms and could make the site feel unresponsive to user interactions. Additionally, images are being served at higher resolutions than needed (saving up to 31KB), and there's a render-blocking CSS file that's delaying initial page rendering. Fixing the JavaScript reflow issues and optimizing image delivery would likely push this site into the 90+ performance range and create a much smoother user experience.
Why It Matters:
Forced reflows are blocking the main thread for 130ms, severely impacting user interactions and INP scores.
How to Fix:
Batch DOM reads and writes to avoid layout thrashing. Move geometric property queries (offsetWidth, getBoundingClientRect) outside of DOM manipulation loops. Use CSS transforms instead of changing layout properties. Consider using ResizeObserver for responsive layouts instead of reading dimensions repeatedly.
Why It Matters:
Critical CSS file is blocking initial page render for 317ms, delaying both FCP and user-perceived loading.
How to Fix:
Extract critical above-the-fold CSS and inline it in the HTML head. Load the remaining CSS asynchronously using media='print' onload technique. Split CSS into critical and non-critical chunks using tools like Critical or PurgeCSS. Remove unused Google Fonts preconnects that aren't being utilized.
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
More Generic Speed Tests
Poor cache policies waste 1.8 MB on repeat visits, increasing LCP by 750ms and FCP by 300ms.
LCP element experiences 4.0 seconds render delay, causing the 9.6 second LCP score.
Unused JavaScript (256 KiB) delays LCP by 1.35 seconds and blocks the main thread for 4.1 seconds.
91% of CSS (44 KiB) is unused and blocks initial render, delaying FCP by 100ms.