Optimize Image Delivery and Caching

How to optimize ibg.amco44.com

Generic SiteScore: 66/100Analyzed May 2026Re-analyze this site

Optimize Image Delivery and Caching

High Impact+25 points estimated

Why It Matters

Images are oversized and poorly cached, causing 11.6s LCP and wasting 405 KiB on unnecessary downloads.

How to Fix

Implement responsive images using srcset for different screen sizes to reduce file sizes by 60-80%. Convert PNG images to WebP format for 30-50% compression. Increase cache lifetime from 4 hours to 1 year for static images by adding 'Cache-Control: max-age=31536000' headers in your web server configuration.

0Needs Improvement

What This Score Means

A score of 66 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.

This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.

Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.

Core Web Vitals Analysis

LCP

Largest Contentful Paint

11.6s
Poor

Good: < 2.5s

Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen

INP

Interaction to Next Paint

21ms
Good

Good: < 200ms

Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions

CLS

Cumulative Layout Shift

0.01
Good

Good: < 0.1

Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load

AI Performance Analysis

This website has poor performance with a score of 66/100, primarily due to extremely slow loading times - it takes 11.6 seconds for the page to become fully interactive and for the largest content to appear. The biggest issue is inefficient image delivery, where images are unnecessarily large for their display size and could be reduced by 405 KB, which would improve loading speed by over a second. The site is also being slowed down by render-blocking CSS files that prevent the page from displaying quickly, poor caching policies that force users to re-download the same files repeatedly, and unused code that wastes bandwidth. Optimizing image sizes, implementing proper caching, and removing unused CSS/JavaScript could dramatically improve the user experience and potentially boost the performance score by 20+ points.

Other Optimization Recommendations

Eliminate Render-Blocking CSS Resources

High Impact+18 points estimated

Why It Matters:

Three CSS files are blocking first paint for 1.93 seconds, severely delaying FCP and user experience.

How to Fix:

Inline critical CSS directly in the HTML head for above-the-fold content. Use media queries to make non-critical CSS non-blocking (e.g., media='print' then switch via JavaScript). Defer Font Awesome CSS loading since 98% is unused, or use a custom build with only needed icons.

Add Image Dimensions and Font Display

Medium Impact+8 points estimated

Why It Matters:

Missing image dimensions cause layout shifts and font loading blocks text rendering, hurting CLS and user experience.

How to Fix:

Add explicit width and height attributes to all img elements, especially the logo and footer images. Set font-display: swap on all custom fonts including Google Fonts and Font Awesome to show fallback text immediately. Use font metric overrides in CSS to minimize layout shifts during font swaps.

Keep Your Site Fast After Optimization

Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.

Explore DeployHQ →Trusted by engineering teams shipping high-performance sites

Want to Analyze YOUR Website?

Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds

More Generic Speed Tests

Generic Performance Resources

Frequently Asked Questions