Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
How to optimize gaming.tracker.pages.dev
The 16KB CSS file is render-blocking and delays initial page paint by 159ms.
Extract critical above-the-fold CSS and inline it in the HTML head. Load the remaining CSS asynchronously using media='print' onload="this.media='all'" technique. Consider using a build tool to automatically identify and extract critical CSS for your gaming tracker layout.
A score of 78 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Interaction to Next Paint
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
Cumulative Layout Shift
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
This gaming tracker site has decent performance with a score of 78/100, but several issues are slowing it down. The biggest problem is oversized images that are loading larger than needed, wasting 31KB and delaying the main content by 150ms - the game cover images are being served at 400x600 pixels but only displayed at 315x472 pixels. Additionally, JavaScript is causing forced reflows (layout recalculations) that create 384ms of blocking time, making the page feel sluggish when users try to interact with it. Fixing the responsive image sizing and optimizing the JavaScript that queries element dimensions could easily push this site into the 85+ performance range.
Why It Matters:
Images are oversized for their display dimensions, wasting 31KB and delaying LCP by 150ms.
How to Fix:
Update your image srcset to include more appropriate sizes for actual display dimensions (315x472px instead of 400x600px). Generate additional responsive image variants at 320w, 180w sizes. Ensure your image processing pipeline creates properly sized variants for each breakpoint defined in your sizes attribute.
Why It Matters:
JavaScript is causing 80ms of forced reflows, contributing significantly to your 384ms Total Blocking Time.
How to Fix:
Batch DOM reads and writes in your JavaScript code to avoid layout thrashing. Cache geometric properties like offsetWidth instead of repeatedly querying them. Move DOM measurements to before style changes, and apply all style changes together in a single operation.
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
More Generic Speed Tests
JavaScript is forcing 125ms of layout reflows, blocking the main thread and degrading user interaction responsiveness.
Images are causing 2,367 KiB of wasted bytes and delaying LCP by 400ms, with the hero image alone accounting for 1.6MB.
545 KiB of unused JavaScript and 208 KiB of unused CSS are blocking rendering and delaying LCP by 2.35 seconds.
The LCP image has a 2.4 second resource load delay because it's not discoverable in the initial HTML and lacks priority hints.