Fix Responsive Image Sizing

How to optimize gaming.tracker.pages.dev

Generic SiteScore: 75/100Analyzed May 2026Re-analyze this site

Fix Responsive Image Sizing

High Impact+8 points estimated

Why It Matters

Oversized images are wasting 31KB bandwidth and delaying LCP by 150ms with poor mobile performance.

How to Fix

Update your srcset to include a 180w variant for desktop display (currently showing 400px images at 180px width). Modify your sizes attribute to be more precise: '(max-width: 480px) 50vw, (max-width: 768px) 33vw, 180px'. Generate additional WebP variants at 180px width for the actual display size.

0Needs Improvement

What This Score Means

A score of 75 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.

This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.

Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.

Core Web Vitals Analysis

LCP

Largest Contentful Paint

3.5s
Needs Improvement

Good: < 2.5s

Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen

INP

Interaction to Next Paint

538ms
Poor

Good: < 200ms

Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions

CLS

Cumulative Layout Shift

0.00
Good

Good: < 0.1

Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load

AI Performance Analysis

Your gaming tracker website has decent performance with a score of 75/100, but there are several key issues slowing it down. The biggest problem is oversized game cover images that are being downloaded at 400x600 pixels but only displayed at 315x472 pixels, wasting 31KB of data and delaying your page load. Additionally, your site suffers from excessive JavaScript blocking (530ms Total Blocking Time) and forced reflows that make the page unresponsive to user interactions for over half a second. To improve performance, optimize your responsive images to serve appropriately sized versions and review your JavaScript code to reduce the blocking time, which could boost your score significantly and make the site feel much more responsive to users.

Other Optimization Recommendations

Optimize JavaScript Main Thread Blocking

High Impact+12 points estimated

Why It Matters:

Total blocking time of 530ms and max potential FID of 540ms severely impacts user interaction responsiveness.

How to Fix:

Split your JavaScript bundles using dynamic imports to reduce initial load. Move non-critical JavaScript execution to web workers or defer until after page load. Implement code splitting in your build process to load only essential components initially, especially for the heavy chunks in nodes/0.ClP3eMLf.js.

Eliminate Forced Reflows

Medium Impact+5 points estimated

Why It Matters:

Forced reflows totaling 128ms are causing layout thrashing and blocking the main thread unnecessarily.

How to Fix:

Batch DOM reads and writes to avoid layout-style-paint cycles. Cache geometric property values instead of repeatedly querying offsetWidth/offsetHeight. Use CSS transforms for animations instead of changing layout properties, particularly in your Svelte components where reflows are occurring.

Keep Your Site Fast After Optimization

Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.

Explore DeployHQ →Trusted by engineering teams shipping high-performance sites

Want to Analyze YOUR Website?

Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds

More Generic Speed Tests

Generic Performance Resources

Frequently Asked Questions