Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
How to optimize gaming.tracker.pages.dev
Oversized images are wasting 31KB bandwidth and delaying LCP by 150ms with poor mobile performance.
Update your srcset to include a 180w variant for desktop display (currently showing 400px images at 180px width). Modify your sizes attribute to be more precise: '(max-width: 480px) 50vw, (max-width: 768px) 33vw, 180px'. Generate additional WebP variants at 180px width for the actual display size.
A score of 75 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Interaction to Next Paint
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
Cumulative Layout Shift
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
Your gaming tracker website has decent performance with a score of 75/100, but there are several key issues slowing it down. The biggest problem is oversized game cover images that are being downloaded at 400x600 pixels but only displayed at 315x472 pixels, wasting 31KB of data and delaying your page load. Additionally, your site suffers from excessive JavaScript blocking (530ms Total Blocking Time) and forced reflows that make the page unresponsive to user interactions for over half a second. To improve performance, optimize your responsive images to serve appropriately sized versions and review your JavaScript code to reduce the blocking time, which could boost your score significantly and make the site feel much more responsive to users.
Why It Matters:
Total blocking time of 530ms and max potential FID of 540ms severely impacts user interaction responsiveness.
How to Fix:
Split your JavaScript bundles using dynamic imports to reduce initial load. Move non-critical JavaScript execution to web workers or defer until after page load. Implement code splitting in your build process to load only essential components initially, especially for the heavy chunks in nodes/0.ClP3eMLf.js.
Why It Matters:
Forced reflows totaling 128ms are causing layout thrashing and blocking the main thread unnecessarily.
How to Fix:
Batch DOM reads and writes to avoid layout-style-paint cycles. Cache geometric property values instead of repeatedly querying offsetWidth/offsetHeight. Use CSS transforms for animations instead of changing layout properties, particularly in your Svelte components where reflows are occurring.
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
More Generic Speed Tests
Total blocking time of 530ms and max potential FID of 540ms severely impacts user interaction responsiveness.
Slow document request latency adds 60ms to both LCP and FCP, impacting perceived performance.
A redirect from turczynski.com to www.turczynski.com wastes 780ms and delays both LCP and FCP by 800ms each.
Main thread is blocked for 4.6 seconds by script evaluation, preventing user interactions and delaying Time to Interactive.