Fix Layout Shifts from Dynamic Content

How to optimize v3.staging.nuitee.link

Generic SiteScore: 31/100Analyzed April 2026Re-analyze this site

Fix Layout Shifts from Dynamic Content

Medium Impact+8 points estimated

Why It Matters

Layout shifts of 0.182 occur primarily from hotels list loading dynamically, hurting user experience.

How to Fix

Reserve space for the hotels list container using CSS min-height before content loads. Add explicit width and height dimensions to the logo image in the header. Implement skeleton screens or placeholders for dynamically loaded hotel cards to prevent content jumping.

0Poor

What This Score Means

A score of 31 falls in the "Poor" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.

This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.

Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.

Core Web Vitals Analysis

LCP

Largest Contentful Paint

13.0s
Poor

Good: < 2.5s

Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen

INP

Interaction to Next Paint

676ms
Poor

Good: < 200ms

Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions

CLS

Cumulative Layout Shift

0.18
Needs Improvement

Good: < 0.1

Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load

AI Performance Analysis

This website has severe performance issues with a score of only 31/100, indicating critical problems that significantly impact user experience. The biggest issue is extremely slow loading times - it takes over 26 seconds for the page to become interactive and 13 seconds for the largest content to appear, which is far beyond acceptable standards. The primary culprits are inefficient caching (wasting 3.2MB of data on repeat visits), oversized JavaScript files (5.7MB total), and unoptimized images that could be 184KB smaller with modern formats like WebP. Implementing proper cache headers, reducing JavaScript bundle sizes, and optimizing images could dramatically improve performance and potentially double the current score.

Other Optimization Recommendations

Implement Efficient Browser Caching

High Impact+25 points estimated

Why It Matters:

Poor cache lifetimes waste 3,258 KiB on repeat visits and delay LCP by 5.1 seconds.

How to Fix:

Configure your web server to set cache headers for static assets to at least 1 year (31536000 seconds). Set main JavaScript bundle cache to 1 year with versioned filenames. Configure image assets from static.cupid.travel to cache for at least 30 days instead of current 1 hour.

Optimize JavaScript Bundle Size

High Impact+20 points estimated

Why It Matters:

The 1.77MB main JavaScript bundle blocks rendering and causes 1.4 seconds of execution delay.

How to Fix:

Implement code splitting to break the large main bundle into smaller chunks loaded on demand. Remove unused JavaScript (412 KiB identified) through tree shaking and audit. Use dynamic imports for non-critical features and defer third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager until after page load.

Keep Your Site Fast After Optimization

Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.

Explore DeployHQ →Trusted by engineering teams shipping high-performance sites

Want to Analyze YOUR Website?

Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds

More Generic Speed Tests

Generic Performance Resources

Frequently Asked Questions