LCP
Largest Contentful Paint
4.4s
Poor
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Fix Image Sizing and Compression
How to optimize sage.vine.aesthetics.com
Fix Image Sizing and Compression
Medium Impact+12 points estimated
Why It Matters
Award images are oversized by 441KB and lack explicit dimensions, causing layout shifts.
How to Fix
Resize award images to actual display dimensions (60x80px for Virginia Living award). Add explicit width and height attributes to all img elements. Use modern WebP format with 80% quality compression.
0Needs Improvement
What This Score Means
A score of 64 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Core Web Vitals Analysis
INP
Interaction to Next Paint
164ms
Good
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
CLS
Cumulative Layout Shift
0.04
Good
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
AI Performance Analysis
This website has poor performance with a score of 64/100, primarily due to extremely slow loading times that hurt user experience. The biggest problem is render-blocking resources (CSS and font files) that delay page rendering by 1.7 seconds, combined with massive JavaScript files that take over 2.6 seconds to process on the main thread. The site also suffers from oversized images (441 KB could be saved) and an enormous 9MB total page size, including a large video file that loads twice. Addressing the render-blocking resources first, then optimizing images and reducing unused JavaScript could improve the score by 30+ points and dramatically speed up the site.
Other Optimization Recommendations
Eliminate Render-Blocking Resources
High Impact+25 points estimatedWhy It Matters:
CSS and font files are blocking page rendering for 1.7 seconds, significantly delaying LCP.
How to Fix:
Inline critical CSS directly in the HTML head. Preload Google Fonts using <link rel='preload'> instead of render-blocking imports. Defer non-critical CSS using media='print' onload='this.media="all"' technique.
Optimize Large Video and JavaScript
High Impact+20 points estimatedWhy It Matters:
Page loads 9MB total with unused JavaScript consuming 1.2MB, severely impacting load performance.
How to Fix:
Compress the 3MB diagnostic video using ffmpeg or HandBrake to reduce size by 60-80%. Code-split JavaScript bundles to load only necessary code initially. Remove or defer YouTube embed JavaScript until user interaction.
Keep Your Site Fast After Optimization
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Explore DeployHQ →Trusted by engineering teams shipping high-performance sites
Want to Analyze YOUR Website?
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
Related Performance Analyses
More Generic Speed Tests
Generic Performance Resources
Optimize Logo Image Delivery
The oversized logo image wastes 97 KiB and delays LCP by 450ms while being displayed much smaller than its actual size.
Remove Unused JavaScript Code
126 KiB of unused JavaScript from Google Analytics and GTM delays LCP by 900ms and wastes bandwidth.
Eliminate Render Blocking Resources
Render blocking CSS and fonts delay LCP and FCP by 1,050ms, preventing users from seeing content immediately.
Optimize Large Video and JavaScript
Page loads 9MB total with unused JavaScript consuming 1.2MB, severely impacting load performance.