LCP
Largest Contentful Paint
6.7s
Poor
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Fix Image Layout Shifts
How to optimize teknene.com
Fix Image Layout Shifts
High Impact+25 points estimated
Why It Matters
Unsized images cause 0.417 CLS score, severely hurting user experience and Core Web Vitals.
How to Fix
Add explicit width and height attributes to all img elements, especially the 'Elektronik – Navigasyon' image causing major shifts. Set dimensions in CSS using aspect-ratio property. Reserve space for dynamically loaded images with min-height containers.
0Poor
What This Score Means
A score of 47 falls in the "Poor" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Core Web Vitals Analysis
INP
Interaction to Next Paint
233ms
Needs Improvement
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
CLS
Cumulative Layout Shift
0.42
Poor
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
AI Performance Analysis
This e-commerce site has poor performance with a score of 47/100, primarily due to severe layout shifting issues. The biggest problem is images without proper width and height attributes, causing a very high Cumulative Layout Shift score of 0.417 that makes the page appear unstable as it loads. The site also suffers from a slow Largest Contentful Paint of 6.7 seconds and excessive unused CSS/JavaScript that's bloating page load times. Fixing image dimensions, optimizing or removing 97KB of unused JavaScript, and addressing the 33KB of unused CSS could dramatically improve both the performance score and user experience by eliminating page jumpiness and reducing load times.
Other Optimization Recommendations
Optimize Critical Resource Loading
High Impact+18 points estimatedWhy It Matters:
Render-blocking CSS delays FCP by 390ms and unused JavaScript wastes 97KB of bandwidth.
How to Fix:
Inline critical CSS for above-the-fold content directly in HTML head. Remove unused Bootstrap JavaScript (55% unused) and defer non-essential scripts. Split JavaScript bundles to load only required functionality initially.
Implement Proper Font Loading
Medium Impact+12 points estimatedWhy It Matters:
Web fonts cause layout shifts and block text rendering, delaying FCP by 610ms.
How to Fix:
Add font-display: swap to @font-face declarations to show fallback text immediately. Preload critical font files (Inter variants) using link rel='preload'. Use font metric overrides to match fallback font dimensions and prevent shifts.
Keep Your Site Fast After Optimization
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Explore DeployHQ →Trusted by engineering teams shipping high-performance sites
Want to Analyze YOUR Website?
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
Related Performance Analyses
More Generic Speed Tests
Generic Performance Resources
Implement Proper Font Loading
Web fonts cause layout shifts and block text rendering, delaying FCP by 610ms.
Optimize Critical Resource Loading
Render-blocking CSS delays FCP by 390ms and unused JavaScript wastes 97KB of bandwidth.
Implement JavaScript Code Splitting
Loading all JavaScript upfront blocks rendering even for components not immediately visible to users.
Preload Critical JavaScript Files
The 45KB index.sGmLo0nR.js file loads last in the chain, delaying interactive functionality.