Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
How to optimize infocalc.ro
Poor font loading strategy is causing 20ms delays and potential layout shifts during text rendering.
Add font-display: swap to your custom font declarations in CSS to ensure text remains visible during font load. Consider using font-display: optional for icon fonts like fl-icons.woff2. Implement font preloading for critical fonts to reduce render blocking time.
A score of 99 falls in the "Good" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Interaction to Next Paint
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
Cumulative Layout Shift
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
This website has excellent performance with a score of 99/100, indicating very fast loading times for users. The biggest opportunity for improvement is reducing unused CSS, which could save 40 KiB and potentially improve loading times by 150ms. The site also has a minor image optimization issue where one banner image is larger than necessary for its display size, wasting about 17 KiB of bandwidth. Additionally, there are some technical issues with font display settings and forced reflows that could be optimized, but these have minimal impact given the already outstanding performance score.
Why It Matters:
40KB of unused CSS is delaying both FCP and LCP by 150ms, directly impacting Core Web Vitals.
How to Fix:
Use PurgeCSS or UnCSS to remove unused styles from the LiteSpeed cached CSS file. Configure your CSS optimization plugin to only load critical above-the-fold CSS inline and defer the rest. Consider splitting CSS by page templates to reduce unused rules.
Why It Matters:
The banner image is 17KB larger than needed for its display size, wasting bandwidth unnecessarily.
How to Fix:
Resize the banner image from 1370x180px to match its displayed dimensions of 721x95px. Use responsive images with srcset to serve appropriately sized images for different screen sizes. Configure your image optimization plugin to automatically generate properly sized variants.
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
More Generic Speed Tests
CSS files block page rendering for 2.47 seconds, preventing users from seeing content quickly.
Images waste 639 KiB of bandwidth with oversized dimensions and outdated formats.
Your LCP image takes 12.4 seconds to load and is lazy-loaded, severely delaying page render.
The banner image is 17KB larger than needed for its display size, wasting bandwidth unnecessarily.