Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
How to optimize ibg.amco44.com
Three CSS files are blocking first paint for 1.93 seconds, severely delaying FCP and user experience.
Inline critical CSS directly in the HTML head for above-the-fold content. Use media queries to make non-critical CSS non-blocking (e.g., media='print' then switch via JavaScript). Defer Font Awesome CSS loading since 98% is unused, or use a custom build with only needed icons.
A score of 66 falls in the "Needs Improvement" range (50-89). While it is better than poor (0-49), you should aim for 90+ to provide an optimal user experience and maximize SEO benefits.
This site is slower than approximately 35% of similar sites. The main issues affecting performance are image optimization, JavaScript execution time, and layout stability.
Addressing these issues could improve your conversion rate by 15-20% and boost your search engine rankings.
Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Measures how long it takes for the main content to appear on screen
Interaction to Next Paint
Good: < 200ms
Measures how quickly the page responds to user interactions
Cumulative Layout Shift
Good: < 0.1
Measures visual stability - how much content shifts during page load
This website has poor performance with a score of 66/100, primarily due to extremely slow loading times - it takes 11.6 seconds for the page to become fully interactive and for the largest content to appear. The biggest issue is inefficient image delivery, where images are unnecessarily large for their display size and could be reduced by 405 KB, which would improve loading speed by over a second. The site is also being slowed down by render-blocking CSS files that prevent the page from displaying quickly, poor caching policies that force users to re-download the same files repeatedly, and unused code that wastes bandwidth. Optimizing image sizes, implementing proper caching, and removing unused CSS/JavaScript could dramatically improve the user experience and potentially boost the performance score by 20+ points.
Why It Matters:
Images are oversized and poorly cached, causing 11.6s LCP and wasting 405 KiB on unnecessary downloads.
How to Fix:
Implement responsive images using srcset for different screen sizes to reduce file sizes by 60-80%. Convert PNG images to WebP format for 30-50% compression. Increase cache lifetime from 4 hours to 1 year for static images by adding 'Cache-Control: max-age=31536000' headers in your web server configuration.
Why It Matters:
Missing image dimensions cause layout shifts and font loading blocks text rendering, hurting CLS and user experience.
How to Fix:
Add explicit width and height attributes to all img elements, especially the logo and footer images. Set font-display: swap on all custom fonts including Google Fonts and Font Awesome to show fallback text immediately. Use font metric overrides in CSS to minimize layout shifts during font swaps.
Once your site is optimized, maintain that speed. Use DeployHQ for zero-downtime, automated deployments—so performance fixes and updates go live safely every time, without breaking your site.
Get AI-powered performance insights with actionable fixes in 30 seconds
More Generic Speed Tests
CSS files are blocking First Contentful Paint for 9.45 seconds, preventing any visual content from appearing.
278KB of unused JavaScript is blocking rendering and delaying LCP by 1.35 seconds.
Two large images (2.5MB total) are causing a 6.6 second LCP delay and using outdated formats.
2.6 seconds of JavaScript execution blocks the main thread and delays interactivity to 21.9 seconds.